Advanced Search
    BI Hongjun, XU Guoqiang, ZHU Yongqiang, QI Jiantao, SHI Xiuhui, BI Junhong, LI Chunlin. Performance comparison of tubing in different injection wells[J]. PHYSICAL TESTING AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS PART A:PHYSICAL TESTING, 2022, 58(12): 39-42. DOI: 10.11973/lhjy-wl202212009
    Citation: BI Hongjun, XU Guoqiang, ZHU Yongqiang, QI Jiantao, SHI Xiuhui, BI Junhong, LI Chunlin. Performance comparison of tubing in different injection wells[J]. PHYSICAL TESTING AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS PART A:PHYSICAL TESTING, 2022, 58(12): 39-42. DOI: 10.11973/lhjy-wl202212009

    Performance comparison of tubing in different injection wells

    • The residual stress of different water injection tubings was tested by blind hole method, and the corrosion performance of tubings was tested by electrochemical corrosion test and water contact angle method, and the performance of tubings with different materials was evaluated. The results show that the residual stress of coated tungsten alloy tubing, ordinary tubing, fiber glass reinforced plastic tubing and anti-scaling tubing decreased in turn. The corrosion resistance of fiber glass reinforced plastic tubing, coated tungsten alloy tubing, anti scaling tubing, and ordinary tubing was from high to low.
    • loading

    Catalog

      Turn off MathJax
      Article Contents

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return