Advanced Search
    ZHANG Jian, WANG Ruomin, LI Jianlin, ZHEN Chao, TANG Wenming. Field Test Error of Leeb Hardness of Bolt Fasteners[J]. PHYSICAL TESTING AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS PART A:PHYSICAL TESTING, 2017, 53(6): 387-390. DOI: 10.11973/lhjy-wl201706003
    Citation: ZHANG Jian, WANG Ruomin, LI Jianlin, ZHEN Chao, TANG Wenming. Field Test Error of Leeb Hardness of Bolt Fasteners[J]. PHYSICAL TESTING AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS PART A:PHYSICAL TESTING, 2017, 53(6): 387-390. DOI: 10.11973/lhjy-wl201706003

    Field Test Error of Leeb Hardness of Bolt Fasteners

    • The Brinell hardness (HBW) and the Brinell hardness converted from the tested Leeb hardness (HLD→B) of as-serviced In783 high-temperature alloy and 1Cr11Co3W3NiMoVNbNB steel bolt fasteners were tested at heads and waists respectively under different conditions (polishing state and grinding state), and the difference between HBW and HLD→B at different parts and under different conditions were studied combined with the microstructure observation. The results show that at the same test position (head or waist) of the two bolts, the hardnesses of the polished samples were higher than those of the ground ones. Under the same test condition (polishing or grinding), the hardnesses of the bolt heads were higher than those of the waists. The HLD→B (grinding state) of the In783 high-temperature alloy bolt were evidently different from the HBW (polishing state) at the same part, and the former was about 4% reduction. This error needed compensating when field test. The relationship between HBW (polishing state) and HLD→B (grinding state) of the 1Cr11Co3W3NiMoVNbNB steel bolt was HBW=1.06-1.10HLD→B, which indicated that for the low-carbon and high-alloy steel there was also a negative deviation compared HLD→B to the actual tested HBW.
    • loading

    Catalog

      Turn off MathJax
      Article Contents

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return