• 中国学术期刊(光盘版)全文收录期刊
  • 中国学术期刊综合评价数据库来源期刊
  • 中国期刊网、万方数据库入编期刊
  • 中文科技期刊数据库(全文版)收录期刊
  • 中国期刊全文数据库全文收录期刊
  • 中国机械工程学会 理化检验分会 失效分析分会 会刊
Advanced Search
ZHANG Jian, WANG Ruomin, LI Jianlin, ZHEN Chao, TANG Wenming. Field Test Error of Leeb Hardness of Bolt Fasteners[J]. PHYSICAL TESTING AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS PART A:PHYSICAL TESTING, 2017, 53(6): 387-390. DOI: 10.11973/lhjy-wl201706003
Citation: ZHANG Jian, WANG Ruomin, LI Jianlin, ZHEN Chao, TANG Wenming. Field Test Error of Leeb Hardness of Bolt Fasteners[J]. PHYSICAL TESTING AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS PART A:PHYSICAL TESTING, 2017, 53(6): 387-390. DOI: 10.11973/lhjy-wl201706003

Field Test Error of Leeb Hardness of Bolt Fasteners

More Information
  • Received Date: November 12, 2016
  • The Brinell hardness (HBW) and the Brinell hardness converted from the tested Leeb hardness (HLD→B) of as-serviced In783 high-temperature alloy and 1Cr11Co3W3NiMoVNbNB steel bolt fasteners were tested at heads and waists respectively under different conditions (polishing state and grinding state), and the difference between HBW and HLD→B at different parts and under different conditions were studied combined with the microstructure observation. The results show that at the same test position (head or waist) of the two bolts, the hardnesses of the polished samples were higher than those of the ground ones. Under the same test condition (polishing or grinding), the hardnesses of the bolt heads were higher than those of the waists. The HLD→B (grinding state) of the In783 high-temperature alloy bolt were evidently different from the HBW (polishing state) at the same part, and the former was about 4% reduction. This error needed compensating when field test. The relationship between HBW (polishing state) and HLD→B (grinding state) of the 1Cr11Co3W3NiMoVNbNB steel bolt was HBW=1.06-1.10HLD→B, which indicated that for the low-carbon and high-alloy steel there was also a negative deviation compared HLD→B to the actual tested HBW.
  • [1]
    王勇,董国振,王庆军,等.600 MW超临界机组高温螺栓的检验[J].热加工工艺,2012,41(16):79-81.
    [2]
    齐向前.不同热处理状态下P92钢里氏硬度值与布氏硬度值的对比[J].理化检验-物理分册,2015,51(9):612-614,648.
    [3]
    杨莉,俄馨,赵江涛,等.里氏硬度计HBS值的测量不确定度评定[J].计量与测试技术,2013,40(6):70-71.
    [4]
    郑晓凯,夏玉峰,陈勇锋.热锻模具的硬度研究[J].热加工工艺,2014,43(8):106-107,113.
    [5]
    杨淑荣,郑伟,张利.里氏硬度与洛氏硬度的数值关系[J].烟台师范学院学报(自然科学版),2002,18(3):175-178.
    [6]
    张雪峰.应用化学抛光进行大型工件的现场金相检测[J].热加工工艺,1985,14(6):56-58.
    [7]
    李久林,尹凯.里氏硬度与其他硬度换算关系的分析与评价[J].物理测试,1998,16(4):13-17.
    [8]
    王智春,蔡文河,吴勇,等.便携式里氏硬度计检测紧固件硬度偏差原因分析[J].华北电力技术,2009(1):27-29.
    [9]
    赖富建.里氏、布氏硬度计测量高温螺栓布氏硬度的对比分析[J].东方汽轮机,2006(2):51-55.
    [10]
    单晓凤,司春杰.里氏硬度值与布氏硬度值、洛氏硬度值的关系[J].山东冶金,1999,21(z1):143-145.
    [11]
    丁海东,李付生,张绪平,等.曲率半径对里氏硬度影响的研究[J].计量与测试技术,2005,32(11):20-21.
    [12]
    崔鹏.试样厚度对里氏硬度测试结果的影响[J].理化检验-物理分册,1997,33(5):33-35.
    [13]
    冯作明,彭朝华,兰中祥,等.现场检验里氏硬度计测试误差影响因素[J].石油化工设备,2013,42(z1):84-87.
    [14]
    李飞.影响里氏硬度计现场检测汽轮机螺栓硬度因素的分析[J].现代工业经济和信息化,2014,4(22):82-83.
    [15]
    王斌.影响里氏硬度检测因素的探讨[J].理化检验-物理分册,2001,37(9):404-405.

Catalog

    Article views (4) PDF downloads (0) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return