高级检索

    仪器化压痕法单次加载数据绘制应力-应变曲线计算拉伸试验结果的方法初探

    The First Exploration to Draw Stress-strain Curves and Calculate Tensile Test Results with Single Cycle Loading Data of Instrumented Indentation Test

    • 摘要: 采用压痕仪自动采集的位移数据减去压痕仪的弹性变形量得到压痕深度,进而计算出压痕直径,再根据TABOR提出的关于压痕方法测试拉伸性能的系列关系式,计算出真应力、工程应力和应变,绘制出压痕法的连续应力-应变曲线和lgW-lgd曲线,根据两种曲线计算出抗拉强度、屈服强度和应变硬化指数(n值)。实测数据显示压痕法的连续应力-应变曲线与拉伸法的应力-应变曲线存在显著差异。对压痕法测得的抗拉强度、屈服强度和n值的测量不确定度进行了详细分析,结果表明:抗拉强度的测量不确定度小于抗拉强度值的10%,而n值的相对测量不确定度显著大于抗拉强度的相对测量不确定度,目前尚未找到可靠评估屈服强度测量不确定度的方法。

       

      Abstract: The indentation depth is obtained by subtract the elastic deformation of the indentation instrument from the displacement data automatically collected by the indentation instrument, and then the indentation diameter is calculated. According to the series of formulas for testing the tensile properties by indentation method proposed by TABOR, the true stress, engineering stress and strain are calculated, the continuous stress-strain curve and lgW-lgd curve of indentation method are drawn, and the tensile strength, yield strength and tensile strain hardening exponent (n value) are calculated according to the two curves. The measured data show that there is a significant difference between the continuous stress-strain curve of indentation method and the stress-strain curve of tensile method. The measurement uncertainty of tensile strength, yield strength and n value measured by indentation method is analyzed in detail. The results show that the measurement uncertainty of tensile strength is less than 10% of the tensile strength value, while the relative measurement uncertainty of n value is significantly higher than that of tensile strength. At present, no reliable method for evaluating the uncertainty of yield strength measurement has been found.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回